There are many things I like about this very different work. I have no problem with breaking all the rules with on/off rhymes and the form of rhyming you have chosen. I would prefer consistency in punctuation though. Whereas a composer can fill the measure with any notes he wants to, he must only conform to the time signature. I think poetry shares a similar rule with punctuation, that is, if you use it all. If not punctuated, I prefer none to some.
As a poetry based therapist/healer I deal with grief and getting people to use poetry as a force of healing. How hard it is for people to grieve, and get over supreme sorrow. The poem to me is more about you, that you so want the sadness to be transcended from this person so that person can be reborn to happiness. Ultimately I have found that when I react with both silence and just acknowledgement of the grief does help those in trauma. I so wish for them they could "let it go".
So I understand your poem and its sincerity.

I enjoy that the poem is concise and focused. However, personally not sure of the title. It has a touch of irony or satire not found in the body.

Nice poem, nice delivery of emotions too. But I agree with Eumolpus concerning the punctuations.

Hurting pasts are better off forgotten and focus placed on the future. A nice piece Lovedly, enjoyed reading it, and thanks for sharing.